Printer Friendly Version Email this to a friend
December 2003 Issue
In its second report on 3Q GDP, the Commerce Department reported that the
economy rose at a blistering annual rate of 8.2%, up from its advance
estimate of 7.2%. Consumer spending was stronger than expected in the 3Q.
Meanwhile, the long suffering manufacturing sector has improved
significantly. Likewise, unemployment data has improved over the last two
months. While a growth rate of 8+% is not sustainable, the economy should
continue to surprise on the upside.
With the economy surging, most analysts expect the Fed to begin raising
interest rates any day now. However, the Fed says it remains committed to
keeping interest rates low. There are two reasons for this. First, the Fed
realizes that the US economy came dangerously close to a deflationary
recession, and as a result they want to maintain a very stimulative interest
rate environment. Second, despite the very low level of short-term interest
rates, monetary growth has actually declined over the last year. The Fed
will eventually begin to raise rates, but probably not for a few more months.
The Bank Credit Analyst remains optimistic about the economy and
equity prices. They expect the economy to grow at a rate of around 4-5%
over the next year, and they believe the stock markets will continue to be
the beneficiaries of a strong economy and continued low interest rates. I
will review their latest thinking in this issue.
The major equity indexes moved sideways to lower in November, despite the
best economic news in years. This has many investors asking why. Actually,
the markets had already anticipated this news, and the recent price action
appears to be a period of consolidation before moving higher. Treasuries
and high-grade corporate bonds remain in the doldrums and are likely to stay
that way. Despite that, Capital Management Group, which trades
in high-yield bonds, continues to have an outstanding year. Gold has
finally broken out above $400 resistance for the first time since early 1996
and appears to be headed even higher. And, we look at gold this month.
Finally, you may (or may not) be happy to know that I am now a clean-shaven
man after 25 years with hair on my face. See page8.
Firing On All Cylinders
Economic reports in November were the strongest in many years. The economy
is now firing on all cylinders, and job growth is poised to improve
significantly over the next 6-12 months. As noted on page one, the Commerce
Department reported that the economy expanded at an annual rate of 8.2% in
the 3Q, up from 7.2% in its previous report and 3.3% in the 2Q. Best of
all, the latest GDP report showed a significant increase in business
investment spending in the 3Q, up 18% for the quarter.
Perhaps second best of all, the manufacturing sector expanded at the fastest
rate in almost 20 years in November. The Institute for Supply Management’s
manufacturing index jumped to 62.8 in November, up from 57 in October. This
marked the fifth consecutive monthly rise in factory output.
Corporate profits soared 30% above yearago levels in the 3Q. This was the
largest year-over-year gain in corporate profits in 19 years. Companies
have been reluctant to hire new workers over the last year, but with the
latest surge in profits and continuing strong demand, the unemployment rate
should continue to fall in the months ahead.
Consumer confidence also rose in November. The Conference Board reported
that its Consumer Confidence Index jumped to 91.7 in November, up from 81.7
in October. Retailers reported that department store sales on the Friday
after Thanksgiving (the biggest shopping day of the year) rose 5.4% over the
same day last year.
The gloom-and-doom crowd, while never silenced, has toned-down its always
pessimistic rhetoric about the economy. Ditto for the Democratic
presidential candidates. Interesting, isn’t it, how these groups never
admit they were wrong, but just go silent and move on to other issues?
Fortunately, my best sources have been mostly dead-on regarding the economic
turnaround in the last year or so.
How Long Can It Last?
Now the question is, how long can the good economic news last? Clearly, the
economy cannot continue to grow at an annual rate of 8+%. Most economists
now expect the growth rate to cool to a 4-5% rate in the 4Q and slightly
below that in the first half of 2004. Those expectations would seem
reasonable in light of the latest 8.2% report.
Yet there are also many respectable analysts who believe that this recovery
could well fizzle after the first half of next year. Most in this camp
argue that the excesses built up in the ‘90s boom were not corrected by the
mild recession of 2000-2001. Likewise, they point to record consumer and
federal debt and conclude that these problems will spell an early end to
this recovery. These, of course, are all serious and valid points that
don’t bode well for the future, but the question is when?
While the storm clouds are clearly on the horizon, this economy may yet
continue to surprise on the upside for at least two reasons. First, US
productivity rates have advanced by record proportions over the last several
years, thanks in part to the recession. While this contributed to the rise
in the unemployment rate, the surge in productivity is bullish for the US
economy in the long run. Second, those predicting an early end to the
recovery fail, in my opinion, to recognize the powerful stimulus of the near
historical low interest rates we have enjoyed over the last few years.
Finally, while consumer debt levels are at record highs, there are not
indications that consumers are about to fall off a cliff in terms of
spending. Actually, consumer spending is expected to increase by 4-5% in
2004. As noted above, business investment spending has finally kicked in,
and this will cushion the economy even if consumers slow down their spending.
The bottom line is that this recovery should continue for another year,
and perhaps even longer, unless there are some major negative surprises to
come.
As you know, I have been a continuous subscriber to BCA for over 25 years.
While not perfect, BCA continues to be the most accurate forecaster of
significant economic turning points and major financial market trends that
I have ever read. This month, I will summarize and quote from BCA’s
December issue. I found their analysis of what the Federal Reserve is, and
has been, thinking particularly interesting.
“The foundations under the U.S. economy are getting stronger. The
corporate sector is emerging from its severe retrenchment, thereby reducing
the economy’s dependence on continued strong growth in consumer spending.
With demand becoming more balanced, there is less need for major policy
stimulus, and the odds are good that the economy will continue to deliver
positive surprises in the coming year.
The Federal Reserve is taking nothing on trust. The Fed’s base case is
that the economy will grow at a decent pace next year, but it does not have
a huge degree of confidence in this forecast. The Fed has thus made it clear
that it will retreat only slowly from its current highly stimulative stance.
The maintenance of abnormally low interest rates will substantially
boost the prospect of solid economic growth, and will foster continued
risk-taking by investors. Equities should keep outpacing both bonds and cash
in 2004, even though the absolute gains from stocks will likely fall short
of those achieved this year...
It is sometimes argued that the Fed has seriously erred by easing
policy so aggressively during the past couple of years. The sharp drop in
interest rates encouraged consumers to take on more leverage rather than
retrench, and also stopped the equity bubble from fully deflating.
There is no doubt that keeping the fed funds rate at 1% has created
financial distortions and has fueled speculation. However, the Fed has
explicitly wanted to encourage more risk-taking, to counter the retrenchment
that normally occurs in the wake of a burst assetbubble. The Fed was not
able to prevent a deep cutback in corporate sector spending, which made it
all the more important to prop up consumers.
After the bubble burst, the corporate sector suffered the worst
downturn in profits since the 1930s. If the Fed had not taken aggressive
action to boost housing and consumer spending, the squeeze on the corporate
sector would have been even more severe, which would have fed back into even
weaker employment. The end result could have been a self-feeding downward
spiral of economic activity and asset prices, presumably triggering a
full-fledged debt deflation...
The Fed’s policy has not been costless. By encouraging the consumer
sector to take on more leverage rather than rebuild savings, the Fed has
raised the stakes for the next downturn. The downside risks in the next
recession may be much greater than they would otherwise have been, because
of increased debt levels. However, the Fed decided that it was worth trading
almost certain disaster in the recent cycle for a potential threat at some
point in the future.
The same argument can be made for fiscal policy. The Administration
has been responsible for turning a large structural fiscal surplus into a
large deficit, with possible serious long-term consequences. Nonetheless,
tax cuts played an important role in supporting the consumer at a time when
the corporate sector was engaged in a vicious retrenchment...
One might reasonably have expected a very deep recession given the
bursting of one of the greatest asset bubbles in history, the shock of
September 2001, the rash of corporate scandals, and high energy prices. The
fact that the U.S. suffered the mildest downturn on record is testimony to
the power of the massive stimulus thrown at the economy.
Even so, the economy skirted dangerously close to deflation, and the
Fed is not convinced that the danger period has ended... The Fed has lost
confidence in its own and everyone else’s economic forecasts. The Fed’s
economic models did not work very well during the past couple of years.”
What the editors are saying here is that the economy’s near-miss with
deflation during the recession basically scared the pants off Alan Greenspan
and the Fed governors. In response, they overreacted and will probably not
breathe a sigh of relief until they see the inflation rate begin to inch
higher. In doing so, they not only managed to avert deflation but they
significantly softened the recession, and now we find ourselves in a roaring
economy. Of course, as BCA pointed out, this has resulted in higher debt
levels and much greater risks whenever the next recession comes along.
When Will Rates Go Up?
This, then, brings us to the question, when will the Fed begin to raise
interest rates again? The Fed knows that a 1% Fed funds rate is too low and
will eventually need to be raised to between 4% and 5%, a level that is
consistent with potential GDP growth. The Fed also knows that the longer
rates stay at 1%, the more problematic the adjustment will be for the
markets. They likewise know that leverage and debt levels will continue to
build as long as rates remain extremely low. Nevertheless, these are
regarded as minor problems compared to those associated with raising rates
too soon. The bottom line is that the Fed feels under no pressure to change
its stance just yet.
Following the last FOMC meeting, Greenspan stated that it is the Fed’s
intention to hold rates at these low levels for a “considerable period.”
As usual, no one knows what he means by that. The latest strong economic
news has led many to suggest that the Fed may begin raising rates any day
now. However, BCA believes that the Fed will insist on seeing
“sustained strength in the labor market (several months of at least 150,000
job gains),” and clearer signs that the threat of deflation
has passed.
Thus, BCA makes the case that any such rate increases won’t begin until
next spring, or maybe even the middle of next year. And they believe that
the Fed will move slowly when they do start to move.
BCA believes that the next move by the Fed will be the dropping of the
“considerable period” (before rates are increased) language, and thus leave
it open as to when rates will be increased. That could possibly occur as
soon as the December FOMC meeting. I don’t believe that will have any
significant negative effect on the markets, since many analysts are thinking
that the latest strong economic news could lead to a small rate increase
very soon.
Will Rate Hikes Hurt Stocks?
As discussed above, it is BCA’s position that the rate hikes won’t begin
until next year, specifically in the 2Q at the earliest, and the increases
will come slowly and in small increments. Unless rates have to be hiked in
a more rapid manner, BCA believes stocks will continue to do relatively
well. They believe that stocks will be even higher in a year than they are
today. In case you are wondering, here is BCA’s argument for holding
above-average positions in stocks and/or mutual funds:
“The equity market has marked time in the past month, despite a strong
showing from the economy and corporate earnings. The market had been
overbought following earlier gains, and geopolitical concerns and mutual
fund scandals have weighed on investor sentiment. Equity prices may have
also been held back by a desire to lock in gains before the end of the year.
Nevertheless, the cyclical bull market remains intact, with the major
indexes holding above their rising 200-day moving averages.
The case for equity prices rests on the following:
[1] The negligible level of short-term interest rates provides a
powerful inducement to seek higher returns in stocks. This is especially
true given the huge stockpile of cash sitting in retail money market funds
and savings deposits. Investors should become more comfortable taking on
extra risk as their confidence in the economy improves.
[2] Valuations are reasonable with the S&P 500 trading at around 17
times forward operating earnings. With earnings expected to rise by at least
10% next year, equity prices will rise even if multiples stay constant.
The bears have been frustrated by the fact that the market never
became compellingly cheap as would have been expected following the bursting
of the bubble. In past bear markets, the price/earnings ratio (based on
forward operating earnings) dropped to 12 or less. This time, it never fell
below 15. However, by slashing interest rates aggressively, the Fed was
deliberately trying to prevent a complete market washout, and its policy was
successful. The market has long since passed the maximum danger point, and a
major relapse would only occur in the context of a major event that shocked
confidence and triggered a renewed slump in the economy. The probability and
timing of such an event is impossible to predict.
This does not mean that the market will not suffer periodic setbacks.
For example, the optimistic level of investor sentiment warns that the
market is still a bit overextended. However, this can be unwound with a
sideways move rather than a large drop in prices.
On balance, we continue to recommend above-average weightings in
equities. The gains during the coming year seem likely to fall short of
those achieved in 2003, but the potential exists for the market to exceed
expectations once again.”
BCA’s views on stock market returns over the next year are consistent with
those of numerous other respected analysts. Specifically, that stocks will
continue to rise in 2004, but not at the pace we enjoyed this year. Most
analysts I read (other than the gloom-and-doom crowd) believe that the broad
stock markets will rise by 8-10-12% next year.
Doing Better Than That
Let’s say you accept the forecast for stocks rising modestly next year, but
you want to do better. You know that a buy-and-hold strategy is generally
only going to make you what the market makes. There are other strategies
that hold out the potential to do better than the market averages. One such
strategy is picking individual stocks that you believe will perform
better than the market overall. Many people do this, and there are
even tax benefits (long-term capital gains) if you hold your stocks a year
or longer.
The problem is, most of us are not good at picking the top performing
stocks, certainly not those that will beat the market averages for a year or
longer. Making matters worse, today’s top performing stocks frequently go
out of favor and underperform the market from time to time.
Another popular strategy to beat the market averages is called “sector
rotation.” In this strategy, you attempt to identify the
hot sectors within the market and invest accordingly. This year, for
example, it paid handsomely to be in tech stocks once again. The Nasdaq
Index is up 47% whereas the S&P500 is up only 21% as this is written. A
sector trader that bought the Nasdaq stocks (or a good Nasdaq-type mutual
fund) would have more than doubled the broad market rate of return so far
this year.
But how many people do you know who shifted into tech stocks early this year
and made those kinds of returns? Not many (or any), I suspect. Sector
rotation is a viable strategy, but like picking the hottest individual
stocks, most of us are not good at knowing which sectors will be hot and
when to get in and out.
Niemann Capital Management
As I have written often, Niemann Capital Management is one of our
recommended Advisors that uses the sector rotation as a part of its
strategy. I included detailed information about Niemann with the October
issue of F&T. If you look back at that information,
you will see that Niemann, with its sector rotation strategy, managed to
significantly outperform the major market averages this year. They have
systems, among others, for identifying the best sectors. Unlike most of us,
they moved back into tech stocks earlier this year and have posted
outstanding results. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of
future results.
If BCA’s (and others’) forecasts for 2004 are correct - that the market
averages will rise by only 8-10-12% next year - this could once again be an
environment where a sector rotation strategy will outperform the market
averages. That remains to be seen, of course, but this is where Iwant to
have a chunk of my equity money in the coming year. As a result, I
am going to increase my allocation to Niemann before the end of the year.
If you haven’t considered Niemann to this point, Isuggest that you do now.
Time To Buy Gold?
With the recent breakout over $400 per ounce, gold has become an even hotter
topic among investors. The last time gold was above $400 was February
1996. If gold remains above $400, there could be considerable upside
potential due, among other things, to short covering. Other reasons include
the unstable geopolitical situation, the recovery in the economy with the
likelihood that inflation will rise and improving supply/demand
fundamentals. Due to the long period of depressed prices, exploration and
production have slowed and mining companies are working to catch up.
Another big factor helping gold along is the decline in the US dollar, which
is expected to continue to fall. Gold does not always react to supply and
demand forces the same way that other commodities do because gold has a
hybrid nature. While it is a commodity used by many industries, it is also
a currency maintained in vast reserves by many countries and as a store of
wealth by individual investors. As a result, the price of gold is often
dictated more by its relative value to currencies rather than on a strict
supply/demand basis. So, the falling dollar is a big plus for gold.
Another potentially explosive factor is the gold “leasing”
programs that have been popular over the last decade or longer. For years,
central banks have been leasing gold to so-called “bullion banks”
that, in turn, sold the gold to investors. The lease contracts, which are
typically rolled over year after year, call for repayment in physical gold
bullion. The assumption in these arrangements is that gold prices will
remain in a relatively narrow price range.
At some point, however, especially if the price of gold continues to rise,
the central banks might elect not to roll over the lease contracts. I don’t
know at what price the central banks would feel compelled to end the leases,
but if the bullion banks have to buy large quantities on the open market,
the price of gold could go through the roof. The central banks, of course,
don’t want to see that happen, so I would not bet on this happening. But I
would not rule it out either.
Reasons To Be Cautious
Just as there are reasons to be bullish about the price of gold, there are
some valid reasons to be cautious about running headlong into a major gold
investment at this point in time. Gold bottomed in 1999 at $252/oz., so it
has already risen over 60% from the low. So, gold is not cheap at
$400+ per ounce. Most of the bullish factors are already priced in, not
that new bullish factors won’t develop, as discussed above.
Many who are convinced that gold will continue to move higher believe the US
dollar is headed for a major collapse. Excuse me, but the economy is
booming and as a result, I don't believe the dollar is headed for a
collapse. Also remember that 2004 is an election year, and all the stops
will be pulled out to make sure the economic recovery continues and the
dollar doesn't collapse.
As I have written before, I have concerns regarding the various methods of
investing in gold, as they relate to the average investor. The purchase of
physical gold in its various forms (coins, bullion bars, etc.) involves not
only significant bid/ask price spreads, but also the additional expense of
storage and insurance (versus the risk of keeping it at home and hoping you
are not robbed.)
An example of the bid/ask spread can be found by going to www.kitco.com. On
the day this is written, the asking price for a one-ounce American Eagle
gold coin is just over $423, while the bid price to anyone wanting to sell
gold Eagles to Kitco is $395. That’s a lot of ground to make up. Gold bars
have smaller bid/ask spreads, but are still significant and there is still
the matter of storage to be dealt with.
I have recently seen direct-mail and e-mail ads offering a “secret
currency” investment that was “outlawed for 41 years,”
but is now graciously offered to you. This investment is nothing
more than numismatic gold and silver coins, which have a value higher
than the spot price of the metal based on rarity and condition of the
coins. This investment not only has the normal problems associated with
physical gold, but adds the requirement that you be able to identify and
evaluate the numismatic qualities that provide the extra value. My advice
is to just say “NO” to these investments unless you are
an expert in this field.
Gold stocks and precious metals mutual funds are another way to
participate. While the price of gold has increased over 60%, many gold
stocks and mutual funds have increased 100% or even more over the
same time period. This brings me to another reason for caution. These
stocks have been pushed up in price, usually based on an assumption of even
higher gold prices. Thus, a higher gold price is built into these stocks
and mutual funds than the current price, and many times by more than the
assets and future production of the various companies can justify.
That brings up another point. Historically, when these mining stocks soar
higher as they have, they tend to fall off a cliff when they peak out
. With gold up over 60% and many of these stocks up over 100%, there will
almost certainly be some very nasty corrections which could occur at any
time.
Gold futures and options are another way to try to get in on the precious
metals action. However, these investments are highly leveraged and contain
a very high degree of risk. Thus, they are generally only appropriate for
those who are experienced in trading such contracts. Remember, most
people lose money trading futures, and especially options, on their own.
When I have written about gold before, I have had readers ask why I didn’t
include a new opportunity called “E-Gold.” The reason I
didn’t is because this is fairly new and appears to be more geared toward
using gold as a method to conduct business on the Internet than as an
investment. The E-Gold website describes it as an “electronic
currency” backed by physical gold held in storage, thus making
international Internet trade more feasible. While it sounds good, I’m going
to reserve judgment for a while.
Conclusions
Gold’s breakout above $400 is a significant positive development for gold.
The trend is up, and it will not surprise me if gold continues to move at
least moderately higher. As discussed above, there are some developments
which could be extremely bullish for gold, but keep in mind that this
possibility has been a fact that has helped drive gold up significantly
already.
The question most investors have been asking me recently is, “Should I
buy gold now?” While I do expect gold to continue at least
moderately higher, buying now - after the price is up 60% in bullion and
100% in some gold mutual funds - means taking a LOT of risk. I
personally would not buy gold today. On the other hand, if you bought gold
earlier at lower prices, I would suggest holding onto it to see if some of
the developments discussed above come into play.
New Gold ETF In The Works
The SEC is currently considering approval of a new Electronically
Traded Fund (ETF) that will be based on the price of gold. If this new
fund is approved, it will be the first vehicle to allow investors to trade
in bullion in a fund concept. In my opinion, this ETF could well prove to
be a better way to invest in gold, since it will be tied to the actual price
of gold and backed by physical bullion (as I understand it) If it works as
suggested, it will solve the storage dilemma related to physical gold.
In addition, this ETF will be traded on the stock exchange just like any
other public security, so buying and selling will not be nearly as onerous
as physical purchases of gold bullion or coins.
Of course, we need to learn more about this new ETF. If it is approved by
the SEC, you will want to read the prospectus VERYCLOSELY as it is a brand
new investment vehicle. I will write more about this new gold ETF if and
when it is approved by the SEC.
Finally, please beware of “predictions” on how high gold is going. Now that
the price is above $400, I hear predictions, that sound like promises, that
gold is going to $500, $600, $800 or $1000 or more. Just remember
that NOONE KNOWS where the price of gold is going! And if for some
reason, gold slumps back under $400, there could be a nasty selloff.
Available In January
Most of our clients have multiple accounts with us. Some have accounts with
the mutual fund Advisors we recommend as well as futures funds and other
types of accounts. Because these accounts are typically held at various
custodians, we have never been able to produce a “consolidated” statement
showing all accounts individually, as well as the total amount you have
invested with us.
For the last year, I have had our computer/software department working on
developing a system whereby we can provide you consolidated account
statements. I am happy to report that we are in the final testing
phase of this project, and we expect to be able to provide consolidated
statements beginning in January.
We will offer the consolidated account statements on a quarterly basis at
your request. The statements will show the beginning balance and ending
balance for each account during the quarter - plus any additions or
withdrawals. The statement will also show the total amount you have
invested with us in all accounts combined. I will let you know when these
statements are ready to go, and you can request them if you so desire.
The Clean-Shaven One
For the last 25 years, I have had hair on my face in one form or another.
When I was in my late 20s and 30s, I liked the beard because it made me look
older. But then in my 40s, the sides of my beard started graying, so I went
to the goutee look. In recent years (I’m now 51), even that started to gray
a little. So, a couple of months ago, I shaved it all off (without telling
anyone in advance). Ican tell you it was quite the surprise! Neither Debi
nor the kids had ever seen me without hair on my face. The before and after
photos are below. Iwill tell you that I miss the hair on my face, and I’m
still getting used to the full shaving routine.
I haven’t talked about my family in a while, so here’s an update. My wife
Debi still works at ProFutures, keeping us all in line. My son
Tyler is now 13 and is still a sports fanatic, playing something
year-round. My daughter Jordyn is 11 and she, too, is very much
into sports. They both go to a private Christian school in our area, and I
continue to be very active in coaching them in sports. We still live on
Lake Travis.
In closing, let me thank you for your business and wish you joyous and
memorable HAPPYHOLIDAYS!!
|